In these graphs, I extrapolated the distribution for people making over $100k. In this first graph, the distribution is if the total amounts of money made by the number of people making a certain income in $2500 increments were all equal. That is, 100k*ppl_making_100k = 102.5k*ppl_making_102.5k, and the shape of the distribution is 1/x. As you can see, the maximum amount of income people are making is around $460k.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/447e6/447e6da379713fd6a12e1b703c73b1550cfec686" alt=""
That is not realistic because I know for a fact that there are many people making millions, but I don't know what is the maximum million of dollars people make in a year. This is the graph that is the same as above but with a few people added at $1 million and $11 million.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9175a/9175a40f273a7f99caaeb27055c48730928154de" alt=""
In contrast, this is usually the kind of graphic that is used when portraying income distribution. It is for the bottom 98% of households from www.visualizingeconomics.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31389/313896136e6088ed903a5434c7f7da746fa8bb6c" alt=""
2 comments:
log-log!
yeah but what is the physical meaning of a log-log scale? I mean, if you make income log, it implies that the distance between 10 and 100 and 100 and 1k are the same, and I don't see how you can say that those are equivalent differences between people's income. it's not to say it's not worth plotting, but I think this is an important shape to look at for the first pass when looking at income.
Post a Comment